Forum Posts: 623 | Comment #1 by ForceGrip86 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:03:07 AM | |
| I'll just buy the DLC individually. I already made the mistake of paying for my COD Elite subscription, I won't make that kind of mistake again. |
|
Forum Posts: 832 | Comment #2 by silverwolf40 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:21:20 AM | |
| @1 You are looking at two completely different things. COD has a subscription while Battlefield is a one time fee that discounts the DLC quite a bit. So even without all the other bonus perks, the premium is worth it. |
|
Forum Posts: 677 | Comment #3 by killzone232 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:21:56 AM | |
| "Biggest Map in BF History" the only downside to that is that ps3 can support up to 24 players only so it'll be a ghost town :/ |
|
Forum Posts: 272 | Comment #4 by HuDaFuK Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:29:20 AM | |
| Dunno, huge maps are all well and good... except when your vehicle gets trashed and you're stuck in the middle of nowhere with a huge slog to get back to another vehicle. |
|
Forum Posts: 483 | Comment #5 by jday222 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:31:23 AM | |
| @1, silverwolf40 is correct. You are only costing yourself more money by paying for the DLC individually. Doesn't make any sense. |
|
Forum Posts: 18 | Comment #6 by Chum Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:37:02 AM | |
| Sweet now I can spend hours on a huge empty battlefield looking for 12 people. So glad I sold this boring game. Call me when you can actually support enough players to call this a battlefield. |
|
Forum Posts: 551 | Comment #7 by jdgkorn Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:42:44 AM | |
I'm ready to wander aimlessly "ALL" over these "HUGE" maps...
MOS-19K anyone??
:-) |
|
Forum Posts: 483 | Comment #8 by jday222 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:55:37 AM | |
@6 why is a bad thing to have variety for a game? If you don't like big maps or vehicle mode then don't play it. They have plenty of other maps and game modes.
Don't understand why anyone would complain about variety. It's a good thing. 6 would be the same guy complaining because they only have a few modes/maps. Never win with some people. Sad.... |
|
Forum Posts: 18 | Comment #9 by Chum Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 10:04:45 AM | |
| @8 I said I don't like huge maps when they aren't properly supported like in the PC version. But some how you interpret that as not liking variety. I don't understand how someone can so poorly misinterpret something that is so clear. Sad.... |
|
Forum Posts: 483 | Comment #10 by jday222 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 10:21:15 AM | |
@9 I read nothing about PC in your original post. You can't comprehend your own writings. Very sad....
"Sweet now I can spend hours on a huge empty battlefield looking for 12 people. So glad I sold this boring game. Call me when you can actually support enough players to call this a battlefield. "
If that's the case go play it on PC and quit trolling a PS3 dedicated site. |
|
Forum Posts: 483 | Comment #11 by jday222 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 10:22:29 AM | |
| @Chum quit liking your own posts. Rookie troll move. Most indeed sad... |
|
Forum Posts: 18 | Comment #12 by Chum Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 10:49:29 AM | |
@10 But you read that I don't like variety. I said quote "Call me when you can actually support enough players to call this a battlefield. "
This is where I was referring to the PC version of the game as it does support enough players. But somehow you read not liking variety out of it.
Try to follow the bouncing ball stupid. |
|
Forum Posts: 4876 | Comment #13 by Loftus Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 10:58:05 AM | |
@2 the thing is though when sales slow down most games release bundles or have a discount week to get some people back into the game. I wouldn't be surprised if BF do it down the line as well.
I love the sound of a bigger map but i have to agree with others, the player limit will kill it for me. That's the one thing with every shooter that makes me jealous of PC players. BF & COD with higher player limits would both make them more enjoyable for me personally. It was one of the reasons i enjoyed resistance 1 & 2 multiplayer back in the day when the games were packed. |
|
Forum Posts: 1427 | Comment #14 by Lurkki91 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 11:07:01 AM | |
| ATVs! This is the map pack I'll get (others maybe later) |
|
Forum Posts: 934 | Comment #15 by nintendo64X Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 11:16:06 AM | |
I rather an all jet map but I guess the tank superiority mode is what bf 1943 had but with tanks :C
Just glad I'm all all vehicle specialist. |
|
Forum Posts: 483 | Comment #16 by jday222 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 11:22:40 AM | |
@Chum at least you didn't like your own post this time, least your graduated to forum level 2.
I guess I can read into the fact you " sold the boring game " in your before mentioned post that it's only boring because its not on your prefered PC format. I see. Even though I have to assume your entire posts because you didn't write the original correctly and have to make up stuff as you go, nor can you comprehend your own post writings. You are very difficult to understand my friend. But hey least your now level 2 forum poster. Maybe by the end of the day you will have enough experience to make to level 3.
Another thing no one is going to call you when it supports enough players. That's rediculous. |
|
Forum Posts: 4457 | Comment #17 by AlphaCookie Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 11:44:55 AM | |
| Can't wait for Tank Superiority. If there is anything I can do in Battlefield 3, its plow the enemy with a Tank. |
|
Forum Posts: 18 | Comment #18 by Chum Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 12:57:52 PM | |
@16 "Another thing no one is going to call you when it supports enough players. That's ridiculous."
I wouldn't expect a genetic reject such as yourself to understand a simple concept known as sarcasm.
"Even though I have to assume your entire posts"
That's all you have done ass make assumptions because you are too stupid to understand a simple paragraph. The words get scrambled in that retard brain of yours and when your fingers try to type what you are interpreting it comes out as total nonsense. |
|
Forum Posts: 3 | Comment #19 by Me Love Cars Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 01:07:53 PM | |
| I am thinking about getting Battlefield 3 Premium. To anybody who has it: Is it worth it? I was hoping Premium Services would continue over into Medal of Honor: Warfighter. |
|
Forum Posts: 11 | Comment #20 by Browbeat Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 01:30:10 PM | |
| @19: If nothing else, Premium is a bundle pack that provides 5 DLC packs (planned at $15, adding to $65) at a discount. The fact that it provides new weapon camos, meta challenges, additional Battlelog features and an in-game marker for premium players depends on how invested you are in Battlefield status and goings-on. I find it worthwhile because it lets me see more tidbits throughout the game that I would otherwise miss, but they are almost entirely cosmetic. In no way is a Premium player better than a core-game player. |
|
Forum Posts: 3196 | Comment #21 by lukey52 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 02:58:13 PM | |
| They better increase the number of players then. Some maps feel barren already! The last thing we need is the biggest map in BF history. It's not fun to run around (or even drive for that matter) seeing 1 other person every few minutes. |
|
Forum Posts: 24 | Comment #22 by deeziefbaby Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 04:42:41 PM | |
| you all must be smoking crack. I never go more than 30sec at most running around trying to find someone, try playing in a full room |
|
Forum Posts: 68 | Comment #23 by bilaljalook Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 04:51:32 PM | |
| did they mention any trophies ? |
|
Forum Posts: 183 | Comment #24 by Skopintsev Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 05:03:03 PM | |
Biggest map in BF History?
Firstly, that statement does not say WHAT PLATFORM. They're probably boasting for the PC platform.
Secondly, It won't be. Kubra Dam and Zatar Wetlands (both BF2) were so absolutely colossal that even with 64 players, it was normal to go for 3-4 minutes without seeing anybody but the air vehicles dogfighting. |
|
Forum Posts: 704 | Comment #25 by andreslr6 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 06:06:30 PM | |
I like the idea but I honestly don´t see it working out so great on the PS3, with 24 people. I think it would´ve been better if they had made it for 32 players at least, doesn´t matter if the graphics got reduced, I think this kind of game deserves better gameplay and more action rather than quasi ghost-towns with "good graphics" (we didn't even get the graphics at their 100% on console). I honestly wouldn't mind an even lower graphics setting, if it's even necessary, in exchange for 8 more players. (and I'm sure I'm not the only one...)
Imagine, 12 players per team distributed in vehicles only. Just with 1 attack heli and the 2 jets fully occupied you already have 1/3rd of the team busy (and as usual, busy with the 1/3rd of the other team using their air vehicles as well), leaving 8 for the other vehicles (or more like, turning the match from 12v12 into an 8v8 battle) let's say 2 tanks and 1 IFV, now instead of having 8 ground units now we'll have just 3; 4 at most if we still wanted to keep the vehicles alive for a decent amount of time(1 driver, 1 engineer). Now distribute those 3 or 4 units in a super huge map with 5-7 flags, we'll get a wasteland. We'll only know the position of the other team when we lose a flag, and by the time we get there they'll be gone already on to the next one and we'll be unable to follow because we're caping the flag we've just lost, etc. At least for me, mixed vehicles don't sound that fun being just 12v12.
Now, the tank superiority mode looks more promising than a mixed vehicle match, at least the 12 players will be in the ground. Imagine 1 occupant per tank, the horizon will look pretty badass with a line of 12 tanks pointing at 12 other on the other side lol, only it can be a little suicidal with no support of an engineer right? :P but lets say 6v6 tanks, 2 occupants per tank, sounds like a lot more fun, maybe with just 3 flags and medium maps.
Who knows, this is just my point of view as of now and maybe I'll change my mind completely when I get it and end up loving it :) .... or hating it after hours of boredom... |
|
Forum Posts: 11 | Comment #27 by nitnoid Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 08:53:08 PM | |
| I think a lot are missing the point. Its a VEHICLE map that's larger, hence, VEHICLE COMBAT. If you are running around on foot, sure, it'll be a ghost town... |
|
Forum Posts: 2957 | Comment #28 by scruffy8642 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 10:26:12 PM | |
| We alrrady found this out a few months ago... Anyway ill probably get premium when this releases so ill have 2 map Packs to play |
|
Forum Posts: 72 | Comment #29 by FfredericC Friday, July 13, 2012 @ 02:53:51 AM | |
| I read in the interview somewhere that the new maps will be accommodated to 24player-games such as they did with maps like Operation Firestorm and Caspian Border (less points to capture, less vehicles to keep things balanced). |
|
Forum Posts: 402 | Comment #30 by KG13 Sunday, July 15, 2012 @ 04:23:53 PM | |
| @6 Get BF3 for PC then, up to 64 players |
|
