|
|
#12 (permalink) | ||
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: In The Clouds
Posts: 3,260
|
Quote:
Quote:
All the LSL games have been "poor video games" by the standards we hold video games....low graphical quailty, ornery controls, no meaningful story, etc. That's why they are awesome...they aren't just another attempt at making a new "gaming giant franchsie". Last edited by RedEye420; 03-10-2010 at 02:51 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,879
|
Like I said, I enjoyed the game. That doesn't mean it's not shit, lol. You basically ran into the lightpost, and said "I meant to do that".
If making a shitty game these days, though enjoyable, is done on purpose, then I can think of about 50 other excuses for other games and why they shouldn't be downplayed. Box Office attempts to be a generic game, with normal platforming and some open world elements. It fails on all fronts. This wasn't done on purpose. It just failed. Come on now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: In The Clouds
Posts: 3,260
|
Quote:
Video games do not have to follow the mold of all successful video games. Just because the GTA's and CoD's blow our minds with stellar graphics, flawless gameplay, and moving storylines...doesn't mean that's the goal of every game. No. Some games really are for shits and giggles. LSL is DEFINITELY for shits and giggles. I'll also remind you, since you seem to have forgotten, that there is no amount of knowledge you can obtain in your lifetime that will ever make your opinions fact. Come on now. You think it's shit...I thought it was absolutely wonderful...but that's because I wasn't about to think I was about to play the next Mario. Now, we've come to a stalemate and I assure continued argument will only result in "arena reasoning" and would be a waste of both our valuable time. So continue to post away with more of your opinions but no matter how much we go back and forth we aren't going to change this tally right here: Aidan's Opinion: Shit game RedEye420's Opinion: Awesome Game Last edited by RedEye420; 03-11-2010 at 03:10 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,879
|
Hey, I enjoyed the game, but on a realistic scale the game was poorly programmed. Bad framerate, jaggy graphics and terrible pop-in have NOTHING to do with Leisure Suit Larry. Nothing.
You actually think they sat there and had a responsive control scheme, but said "no, we have to make this a Larry game, so break it."? Come on now. Their "meant to do this" attitude is a cheap disguise for lack of talent, resources, manpower and experience. I liked the game. It just wasn't a good game. Two different things. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,879
|
If you want to call a terrible engine, with terrible textures, frame rate, inconsistent button input, terrible collision detection and horrible control schemes a good or bad attempt at video games by opinion, then so be it.
I'd call it being the Devil's advocate due to your need to defend what you like, unconditionally, without being realistic. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: In The Clouds
Posts: 3,260
|
Quote:
That's the point you continue to refuse to listen to. I never said "they made the game bad on purpose." I said.."LSL people know that LSL is not about great game-making. It's about entertainment." That means that when the people sat down and said..."Hey wait...these graphics can't compete, the platforming is sloppy and the framerate can sometimes be sluggish...." a smart person in the room stepped in and said, "This is LSL. We don't need to be a perfect game. We need to be an entertaining game. Instead of spending dollars on programmers fixing bugs and re-coding, we are spending them on voice-over talent and marketing....because in the end...LSL fans want to be entertained.....not impressed. This game is for entertainment." It seems even you have admitted that it succeeded in that. To me...that's a successful game. It set out to do EXACTLY what it was attempting to do....to entertain you. EDIT: P.S. I'm signing off now I'm not ignoring you. Last edited by RedEye420; 03-11-2010 at 03:24 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,879
|
I would never expect perfection. I would expect at least some effort. Tomb Raider Underworld, for instance, is far from perfect, but it's highly playable, and it shows effort. Same with games like Wanted, Wolverine, etc.
There's trying and somewhat succeeding, and there's just plain failing and not even trying. I felt they didn't even try with this game. It's just that I enjoyed the story/characters/dialog, but I would've much more preferred a click 'n play adventure, rather than a sandbox game. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | ||
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: In The Clouds
Posts: 3,260
|
OK i'm back! <3 Miss Me?
Quote:
Quote:
I feel like hating LSL 'cause it has bad graphics or sloppy controls is like hating Bob Saget because he cusses in his act. You shouldn't have gone to see him with that attitude to begin with because you knew you what you were gonna get. Last edited by RedEye420; 03-11-2010 at 10:44 AM. |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|